Farewell Early DTFs: Reserve Moves to Deprecate 17 DTFs

Reserve's $RSR Token Can Now Be Spent at Over 50 Million Merchants with AEON

$RSR can now be spent at over 50 million merchants across Southeast Asia, Nigeria, Mexico, Brazil, and Georgia.

$RSR can now be spent at over 50 million merchants across Southeast Asia, Nigeria, Mexico, Brazil, and Georgia. The integration, through a partnership with AEON - a payments infrastructure project building settlement rails for AI-driven commerce - puts RSR into physical retail and online checkout for the first time.

AEON Pay handles the transaction layer, as a mobile payment interface for Web3 assets, accessible through a Telegram Mini App and connected to Bitget Wallet, Binance Wallet, OKX Wallet, TokenPocket, KuCoin, and Bybit. Users do not leave familiar interfaces to pay - a practical detail that tends to determine whether crypto payments actually get used.

RSR's role inside Reserve has historically been narrow in a specific way: stakers provide first-loss capital on Yield DTFs, absorbing losses before other holders if collateral breaks, and in return take a share of yield. Governance rights come with it. But payments are something different, as they give the token a function that does not depend on the protocol's internal mechanics at all.

Reserve's product range is built around Decentralized Token Folios: on-chain instruments that bundle multiple crypto assets into a single token. They behave like index products: transparent composition, immediate redemption, composable with other DeFi protocols.

CMC20, built with CoinMarketCap, tracks the top 20 crypto assets by market cap in a single tradable token. Kraken and Bloomberg have also used Reserve's infrastructure to issue their own DTFs. Until now, these assets have lived almost entirely within DeFi - useful for portfolio exposure, not for buying anything.

If RSR circulates through a payments network, it stops behaving purely as a staking asset or governance token. The underlying structure is still more complex than a stablecoin, but the user experience starts to resemble one. But really, we hope to see DTFs arrive on AEON.

The expansion is targeted at markets where that framing already makes intuitive sense. Nigeria, Mexico, and Brazil are not markets where crypto is mainly a speculative asset - they are places where it functions as a parallel monetary system for people who cannot rely on local currency stability. AEON's further rollout is planned across Africa and Latin America, which sharpens that focus.

The more unusual part of this integration sits in the infrastructure underneath it. AEON Pay is built on x402, a payment protocol released by Coinbase's developer platform in May 2025. The mechanism is a reactivation of HTTP 402, a status code written into the HTTP specification in 1997 under the label "Payment Required."

It was included in the original spec as a placeholder for a future micropayment system that never arrived. Every major browser and server framework has recognized it for nearly three decades; it just never did anything. Coinbase built the protocol to finally use it, connecting HTTP-native payment requests to cheap blockchain settlement.

The reason x402 matters now, specifically, is AI agents. Autonomous software agents are making API calls, consuming data feeds, executing trades, and running multi-step workflows across services - and they need to pay for access to those services without human approval cycles. A credit card form is not a viable option for a process that runs in milliseconds.

x402 allows a server to respond to an agent's request with a payment demand, the agent pays on-chain, and the transaction proceeds - all within the same HTTP interaction.

AEON also supports ERC-8004, an emerging standard for trustless payment channels, and integrates with Google's Agent Payment Protocol, AP2 - a Google-led effort to standardize how AI agents authorize and settle payments.

The practical flow looks something like this: an agent uses Google's A2A protocol to locate a service, AP2 to authorize the transaction, and x402 to settle it. RSR is now a token that can move through that process.

That is a different kind of exposure than merchant payments. Merchant payments are real and immediate - 50 million merchants is a number that means something. But the agent economy is where the volume could get large in ways that are harder to predict, and Reserve now has a position in both.

Source

MATTHEW

APRIL 15, 2026

Does the Reserve Protocol Register app pass SEC Dealer-Broker Rules?

The SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets has given guidance that offers intel for DeFi users and the creators of DeFi front-ends, such as Reserve Protocol.

The SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets has given guidance that offers some intel for DeFi users and the creators of DeFi front-ends, such as Reserve Protocol's Register. The agency has given a checklist for software developers to avoid the radioactive label of an unregistered broker-dealer.

The guidance isn't law, but does give good intel, as summarized by TheDefiant, and we're going to attempt a layman's interpretation on how it applies to Reserve Protocol.

The Reserve Protocol’s Register app allows for minting and managing Index DTFs, which are similar to on-chain ETFs, as well as Yield DTFs, which are asset-backed currencies supported by diverse collateral baskets.

In our view, compliance hinges partly on the app’s refusal to touch the money. The SEC staff’s primary condition for safety is a total lack of custody, which Register clears by making users bring their own keys and crypto via third-party wallets. If the software never sees a private key and never holds a balance, it escapes the most traditional definition of a broker.

Based on the criteria outlined in the SEC staff guidance and the public documentation for the Reserve Protocol and its interface (Register), here is an evaluation of how the app aligns with those requirements:

1. Does not take custody of user funds

Pass: The Reserve Protocol and the Register app are explicitly designed as self-custody solutions. Users connect their own third-party wallets (like MetaMask or Ledger). According to the Reserve Terms and Conditions, the protocol does not have "possession, custody or control" over any user's digital assets.

2. Provides no investment advice or trade recommendations

Pass: The interface is built to facilitate the creation and management of DTFs. While it displays information about different DTFs and their underlying collateral, the documentation classifies this as "informational purposes only." It does not provide personalized advice, nor does it recommend specific trades to users.

3. Does not route or execute orders on users' behalf

Pass: The Register app acts as a front-end for interacting with on-chain smart contracts. When a user mints or redeems DTFs , the "execution" happens via the user's own wallet and the blockchain, not via a centralized matching engine or a proprietary routing service owned by the app operator. The app facilitates "user-initiated" transactions as defined in the guidance.

4. Generally charges a fixed percentage as a transaction fee

Pass: The Reserve Protocol utilizes a transparent, code-governed fee structure. DTFs can have specific "Mint Fees" and "Redemption Fees," which are typically set as a fixed percentage (e.g., 0.15% or 0.25%) by the specific DTF’s governance. These fees are programmed into the smart contracts rather than being dynamic "spreads" or hidden markups typical of traditional broker-dealers.

5. Exercises no discretion over transactions or market activity

Pass: Transactions on the Register app are atomic and governed by smart contracts. The protocol team does not have the ability to manually pause, reverse, or selectively approve individual user transactions. Rebalancing and collateral auctions are "entirely mechanistic based on on-chain price-feeds" and do not depend on human judgment or manual discretion by the developers.

Additional Prohibitions

Labeling Routes as "Best" or "Preferred": To remain compliant with this specific staff guidance, the Register app must ensure it does not label specific DTFs or trading paths with subjective terms like "Best Yield" or "Recommended." Most DeFi interfaces have recently moved toward neutral sorting (e.g., by TVL or alphabetical) to avoid this, and Reserve has historically been careful in this regard.
Commentary: The app must avoid marketing language that could be interpreted as financial promotion or investment advice. Which is basically Nevin's mantra.

Summary Table

Requirement	Status	Evidence
No Custody	✅ Pass	Uses self-custodial wallets; no control over user keys.
No Advice	✅ Pass	Purely informational interface; no trade recommendations.
No Routing/Execution	✅ Pass	Users sign and broadcast their own transactions.
Fixed % Fees	✅ Pass	On-chain mint/redeem fees are fixed by protocol parameters.
No Discretion	✅ Pass	Mechanistic, smart-contract-driven activity; no human "gatekeeper."

Conclusion: The Reserve Protocol’s "Register" app appears to align well with the SEC staff guidance for "covered user interfaces."

Its decentralized, non-custodial nature is exactly the type of architecture the guidance seeks to distinguish from traditional broker-dealer activities. We'll point out we are not lawyers, and may have missed nuances or got things wrong.

MATTHEW

APRIL 13, 2026

Reserve Protocol Launches Delegate Program: 60% of Core Voting Power to Community

ABC Labs and Confusion Capital have delegated 60% of their staked RSR voting power across four live Yield DTFs: eUSD, ETH+, bsdETH, and USD3.

Reserve Protocol now has its first group of Guardians, with six delegates now in place, and the majority of core voting power has been pushed out of the founding entities and into their hands.

ABC Labs and Confusion Capital have delegated 60% of their staked RSR voting power across four live Yield DTFs: eUSD, ETH+, bsdETH, and USD3. The move reduces direct control from the core collaborators and places it with a group of independent but accountable participants.

The program began on April 1 and will run for three months through June 30 as an initial test.

The delegates are already assigned, and each one covers two Yield DTFs (formerly RTokens), with three delegates watching every DTF. That overlap creates redundancy where governance has historically been thin. If one delegate misses something, the other two are still in the room.

The names are known participants - 0xd15co, Braden, Eureka, Ham, R72, and Zeb - now operating with a defined scope and visible responsibility. Their job is straightforward: read proposals, vote, and explain themselves in public.

That last requirement is non-negotiable: every vote must include a written rationale posted in the delegate’s forum thread.

Participation is tracked, with a 90% voting coverage target across all proposals. Miss it once, and the system flags it. Miss it twice, and they’re out. The role is voluntary and not permanent, but participation is required.

Delegates receive $250 per month in RSR, which is enough to formalize the role, but not enough to compete over. The expectation is that these are already engaged participants, not applicants chasing yield.

On eUSD, roughly 239.6 million stRSR has been distributed across delegates. ETH+ accounts for another 47.5 million. USD3 and bsdETH follow with smaller allocations. Across each product, a measurable share of governance has been moved out of the hands of its largest stakeholders.

In effect, delegates now sit between passive stakers and live governance in a layer that did not exist before. Previously, proposals often relied on a mix of core contributors and sporadic community attention. Now, specific people are expected to show up every time.

The system is still open, with no hard barrier to becoming a delegate and no restriction on who can receive delegated voting power. The six names announced this week are the starting point, and others can enter if they can attract a delegation and maintain the same level of participation.

Read more: Reserve Forums

MATTHEW

APRIL 8, 2026

Trail of Bits Points to Reserve Protocol for Blockchain Development Best Practices

Security firm Trail of Bits has singled out Reserve Protocol as an example of how DeFi code should be written.

Security firm Trail of Bits has singled out Reserve Protocol as an example of how DeFi code should be written - less for what it does, and more for how it thinks.

The context is a new write-up and Twitter thread from the audits firm, arguing that a large class of DeFi bugs can be caught early using a simple technique borrowed from physics: dimensional analysis. The premise is blunt. If the “units” in a formula don’t match, the formula is wrong. No exploit required, no edge case needed.

That sounds abstract until you translate it into DeFi terms. Instead of meters and seconds, the system deals in tokens, prices, liquidity, and shares. These are different “dimensions.” Mix them carelessly and you get outputs that look fine on-chain but don’t represent anything real.

Trail of Bits’ point is that most smart contracts don’t enforce this discipline. Solidity doesn’t know the difference between a token balance and a price. It just sees integers. That leaves developers relying on memory and convention, which is where things break.

Reserve Protocol takes a different approach, a lesson that’s been known for millenia but often ignored to people’s peril and the destruction of space shuttles: It writes the units down.

Across its contracts, variables are annotated with both their dimension and their scale. A value isn’t just “a number.” It’s something like “unit of account per token, scaled to 27 decimals.” That might sound like overkill, but it changes how the code is read. If a developer tries to combine two values that don’t belong together, the mismatch is visible immediately.

Trail of Bits credits this as a best practice because it turns reasoning into a first line of defense, one where you don’t need to understand the entire system to spot a mistake. If a function expects token amounts and receives decimals instead, the error becomes obvious - and it is an issue that has shown up in real audits.

The firm says this as a missing habit in DeFi development, with many protocols relying on testing and audits to catch logic bugs after the fact. Dimensional thinking moves that earlier in the process and filters out entire categories of errors before they become exploitable.

It also explains why some designs work and others don’t. In automated market makers, adding two different tokens together is meaningless unless you assume they hold the same value. That’s why stable pools can get away with it, and why the same formula breaks elsewhere. The math hasn’t changed but the assumptions have.

Reserve’s approach doesn’t require new tooling or language changes but discipline - something that has been obvious to long-time followers for a while. Label what each value represents, track how it changes, and be explicit when converting between forms. It’s closer to engineering than coding.

Trail of Bits is now pushing toward automation, with internal tools that can check these relationships across a codebase. But the endorsement of Reserve is the simpler takeaway. You don’t need a new compiler to avoid basic mistakes but you do need to know what your numbers mean. It’s a structure that is doing more work than most realize.

RSR Burn: How Much RSR is Burned Each Month?

As of March 2026, 61.6 million RSR has been burned by Reserve Protocol so far.

How much RSRs burn each month?

The amount changes each month, but it is a culmination of management fees on Index DTFs and (perhaps more importantly) the minting fee every single time someone mints an Index DTF.

Each index charges an annualized fee based on its total value locked. That fee isn’t paid in RSR directly but collected from the underlying assets in the basket, then routed through the protocol’s buyback mechanism. The protocol purchases RSR on the open market and permanently removes it from supply.

The second element is minting activity. Every time a user mints a DTF, aka creating index tokens from the underlying collateral, a minting fee is applied.

For instance, on CMC20, the minting fee is 0.3%, and a third of that goes to the RSR burn. You can think of it as "0.1% of the minted amount".

So a $25,000 mint creates $25 in a burn. It may not sound much, but it adds up quickly - especially now that arbitrage bots have discovered Reserve Protocol.

As of March 2026: 61,664,852 RSR has been burned

As a dollar amount: $96,629

RSR Burn March 2026

Date	RSR burned	USD value
Mar 23, 2026	16,096,854	25,223.77
Feb 20, 2026	12,674,832	19,861.46
Jan 23, 2026	3,903,976	6,117.53
Dec 21, 2025	9,829,776	15,403.26
Dec 1, 2025	4,744,733	7,435
Oct 21, 2025	2,975,478	4,662.57
Sep 25, 2025	1,965,638	3,080.16
Aug 22, 2025	1,182,789	1,853.43
Aug 3, 2025	2,734,623	4,285.15
Jul 25, 2025	527,802	827.07
Jun 20, 2025	3,746,598	5,870.92
May 20, 2025	1,281,683	2,008.40

As a TLDR, the burn rate scales with TVL, not speculation. A larger index base (more capital sitting inside CMC20, BTC-focused baskets, or thematic portfolios) translates into a higher dollar value of fees, which in turn translates into more RSR being bought and burned.

The RSR Burn Mechanics: Explained

The mechanics sit inside a broader design choice: Reserve Protocol is trying to tie token economics to real protocol revenue. The RSR token serves as collateral and governance for the Reserve Protocol, and its role inside decentralized token folios has expanded alongside the protocol’s evolution.

What began as a stability-first system now leans into index products and yield-bearing RToken structures, with fees flowing back into the reserve ecosystem in a way that directly affects circulating supply.

Once a month, the revenue from each Index DTF is gathered, and then used to buy and burn RSR. The assets collected, whether from management fees or minting, are routed through an decentralized exchange, converted into the Reserve Rights token, and sent to a burn address.

That process reduces the total supply over time, creating deflationary pressure tied to usage. It’s not a fixed schedule, and the revenue generated depends on adoption, TVL, and how much capital flows through each chain where these products are deployed.

For RSR holders, the model is designed to align long term holders with the protocol’s success. As more capital enters Decentralized Token Folios, the fee base grows. That increases buy pressure on the RSR token while removing units from circulation, a dynamic that aims to offset sell pressure during weaker periods.

The idea is simple enough: more usage leads to more token burn, which in turn can increase scarcity and influence long term value, even if short-term price impact remains uneven.

Governance is part of that mechanism, with RSR stakers influencing risk parameters, vote on governance proposals, and shape how fees are structured or distributed. Governance weight is tied to stake, which means those committing capital have a direct role in maintaining stability and setting insurance buffers across the system.

This governance model has already been tested through changes to fee splits, collateral baskets, and the handling of protocol revenue.

There’s also an growing conversation around a more explicit burn proposal. While the current system already reduces supply through fee-driven buybacks, some members of the community have discussed whether a larger portion of revenue should be directed toward increasing token scarcity more aggressively in a new governance model, potentially prioritizing burn over other uses like incentives or insurance buffers.

For now, the balance remains dynamic, with governance proposals adjusting how revenue is allocated as the protocol moves forward.

If adoption of the products grows, particularly those generating yield through integrations with platforms like Curve Finance, the portion of revenue feeding into buybacks increases. Over time, that can reduce circulating supply in a way that reflects real economic activity rather than artificial constraints.

For discerning investors, it is less about immediate profit and more about whether the system can maintain demand. The main goal is to create a situation where usage drives revenue, revenue drives burns, and burns reinforce scarcity.

If that holds, it strengthens the project’s future. If it breaks (if adoption stalls or yield dries up) the burn mechanism becomes less relevant.

It is a structure that aims to connect governance, revenue, and supply in a way that rewards participation and allows holders to earn rewards through staking and influence. This is not financial advice and whether it succeeds depends on the community, the pace of adoption, and how effectively RSR holders continue implementing changes that keep the system competitive.

Call it an introduction to a different kind of token model: one where scarcity is earned, not declared, and where every burn is the result of activity on-chain rather than a line in a whitepaper.

If you want to track the burn yourself, there is a Dune dashboard by Starl3xx

MATTHEW

MARCH 24, 2026

February 2026: Reserve Protocol's RSR Burn is ~16M RSR

For February 2026, around ~16.M RSR will be burned, as noted in the Reserve Telegram channel. The actual burn takes place on March 23, 2026.

Every month, a portion of the RSR supply is burned, a product of the fees primarily generated by the minting and holding of Index DTFs.

For February 2026, around ~16.M RSR will be burned, as noted in the Reserve Telegram channel. The actual burn takes place on March 23, 2026.

Each month, the USD accrued in fees is used to market-buy RSR, before being sent to the furnace / the NULL address.

As Index DTFs grow in size, the burn is expected to accelerate.

The burn is currently carried out manually by multi-sig community participants, and RSR holders can propose different uses for the RSR instead - but for the time being, it is expected most holders will support a burn.

MATTHEW

MARCH 22, 2026

Last Chance: Apply to Be a Reserve Protocol Delegate for $250 a Month

The program is designed to formalize and incentivize active participation in governance of on-chain indexes on Reserve Protocol.

Applications for the Reserve Protocol’s new delegate program are set to close on Wednesday, 18 March at midnight UTC, marking the final opportunity for participants to get paid to help govern DTFs (on-chain indexes and sta Governance on Reserve Protocol ble currencies) on Reserve.

The program, as outlined in a recent governance proposal on the Reserve forum, is designed to formalize and incentivize active participation in governance. At its core is a simple idea: pay contributors to pay attention.

Selected delegates will receive $250 per month to review proposals, vote on governance decisions, and represent the interests of the broader community. The structure is intentionally lightweight and not a full-time role, but rewards those already following the protocol closely and can make wise, articulated decisions across the ecosystem.

Visibility and accountable participation are the important aspects. Those applying are effectively being paid to be in an environment where reputation, consistency, and clarity of thinking matter.

Delegated Move Toward Active Governance

Many protocols have struggled with governance apathy where token holders fail to vote, proposals pass with minimal scrutiny, and decision-making concentrates in a small number of active participants. While Reserve in time may move to optimistic governance, maintaining DTFs needs close, careful work.

The delegate model attempts to fix that by introducing named actors with defined responsibilities where, instead of anonymous wallets, governance becomes something closer to a public process. Delegates are expected to:

review proposals in detail
engage in forum discussions
vote with clear reasoning
build a track record over time

The monthly stipend is not large, but that is part of the design. It is enough to create accountability without turning the role into a purely financial incentive.

Reserve Protocol is entering a period of increased activity across its ecosystem, with:

new DTF launches
changes to eUSD revenue share structures
potential integrations with tokenized assets
ongoing governance around product design

As the number of proposals grows, so does the need for informed participants who can process them quickly and publicly.

What Happens Next

Once applications close, the next phase will likely involve:

selection or recognition of initial delegates
early governance participation
tracking of engagement and performance

From there, the system can evolve, and delegate influence may grow as token holders choose to follow and delegate voting power to those they trust.

In that sense, the program is less about the initial $250 monthly payment and more about establishing an accountable, decentralized layer of governance inside Reserve.

For anyone already following Reserve Protocol and who wants to take part, a reminder that applications close Wednesday, 18 March at midnight UTC (we expect this may be extended, but let's see).

Apply to be a Reserve Delegate

MATTHEW

MARCH 17, 2026

Uglycash Wallets Add Nearly 800,000 eUSD in a Month

Uglycash-linked wallets have increased their holdings of eUSD by roughly $864,000 over the past month, according to data from the latest snapshot.

Uglycash-linked wallets have increased their holdings of eUSD by roughly $864,000 over the past month, according to data from the latest snapshot used in the Reserve ecosystem’s revenue share programme update.

Balances across identified Uglycash wallets rose from 11,448,871 eUSD on 26 February 2026 to 12,313,213 eUSD on 12 March 2026, an increase of 864,342 eUSD, or about 7.55% over the period.

The largest wallet on Base grew from just over 11.19 million eUSD to 12.04 million, which accounts for the majority of the increase.

It reflects a steady rise in stablecoin balances inside the consumer-facing crypto application. In practical terms, it means several hundred thousand dollars’ worth of additional capital now sitting inside wallets connected to Uglycash.

The numbers were shared as part of the eUSD Revenue Share Programme update, which periodically snapshots wallet balances to determine how revenue generated by eUSD usage is distributed across the ecosystem.

Unlike speculative token flows, stablecoin balances tend to move slowly - when they rise, it often reflects user behavior rather than market noise. In this case, the increase suggests more users are holding eUSD inside Uglycash, more funds are moving through the app, or both.

What the Increase Signals About Adoption

An increase of nearly 800,000 eUSD inside Uglycash-linked wallets likely reflects a combination of new deposits, retained user balances, and ongoing trading activity within the app. Unlike speculative token flows, stablecoins often function as working capital - it is the liquidity users hold for spending or saving.

Uglycash now thinks of itself as a social trading environment rather than a traditional crypto wallet. Users discover assets through traders, clubs, and community feeds rather than by searching token lists. In that context, stablecoins often act as the fuel inside the system.

The timing also coincides with the release of a new version of the app that features Reserve DTFs prominently and allows non-U.S. users to access tokenized stocks through Ondo’s infrastructure. Both features broaden the set of assets users can hold and trade within the same interface.

Stablecoin balances tend to expand when platforms begin to feel usable - when users leave funds inside instead of withdrawing them.

eUSD’s Role Within Uglycash and Reserve

eUSD is the dollar-pegged RToken designed for fintech integrations, acting as both a stable medium of exchange and a yield-bearing asset depending on where it sits in the system.

Unlike simple collateral-backed stablecoins, eUSD operates within Reserve’s over-collateralized framework - the token is backed by a basket of assets and secured by staked RSR, which acts as a backstop in case collateral value drops below required levels.

That structure ties stablecoin growth directly to governance participation. When eUSD expands, the system relies on RSR stakers to “insure” it.

Revenue generated through the eUSD ecosystem, whether from minting fees, yield strategies, or other mechanisms, is distributed through the protocol’s revenue share programme.

A governance proposal currently under discussion would redirect 10% of revenue generated on fintech-held eUSD balances to staked RSR holders, bringing them into the revenue stream alongside participating fintech platforms.

The change would partially rebalance incentives between distribution partners and governance participants.

For stakers, the proposal introduces a simple dynamic: as fintech usage grows, a portion of that revenue flows back to those securing the system.

More eUSD circulating through applications like Uglycash therefore has a direct impact on the broader Reserve economy.

Uglycash is Reserve’s Retail Gateway

Uglycash is designed to make decentralized token folios accessible to everyday users without requiring them to interact directly with DeFi interfaces. Instead of minting RTokens or managing collateral, users interact with familiar wallet features: portfolios, trading feeds, and social discovery.

Inside the app, users can trade DTFs such as CMC20, track strategies from other traders, and move between multiple chains, including Base, Ethereum, and Solana, from a single balance.

Outside the United States, the wallet also allows users to purchase tokenized stocks and ETFs through Ondo’s tokenized asset infrastructure, placing traditional equities alongside crypto portfolios.

The approach borrows from social trading platforms more than from conventional DeFi dashboards. Discovery happens through people, not through protocol documentation.

Stablecoin balances like the recent eUSD increase offer a rare glimpse into whether that approach is working, and more capital sitting inside the wallet means more users are choosing to keep funds there.

For a consumer-facing crypto app, that’s usually the first real sign of traction.

MATTHEW

MARCH 15, 2026

Farewell Early DTFs: Reserve Moves to Deprecate 17 DTFs

Which DTFs Are Affected

What Happens to Holders

The Cleanup

Time to Comment

The RSR Burn Mechanics: Explained

Delegated Move Toward Active Governance

What Happens Next

Farewell Early DTFs: Reserve Moves to Deprecate 17 DTFs

Which DTFs Are Affected

What Happens to Holders

The Cleanup

Time to Comment

The DTF Family

More Stories

1. Does not take custody of user funds

2. Provides no investment advice or trade recommendations

3. Does not route or execute orders on users' behalf

4. Generally charges a fixed percentage as a transaction fee

5. Exercises no discretion over transactions or market activity

Additional Prohibitions

Summary Table

The RSR Burn Mechanics: Explained

Delegated Move Toward Active Governance

What Happens Next

What the Increase Signals About Adoption

eUSD’s Role Within Uglycash and Reserve

Uglycash is Reserve’s Retail Gateway